So rating psychics, calling them frauds, trash, and insert every negative comment on this board is okay? But calling out people and making a list of those who are chronic bashers , is somehow wrong? Many of the people on these lists are other advisors in new accounts bent on destroying other psychics. Or just some crazy ass people who have either unrealistic exceptions of what a reading entails, are bat shit crazy, I've read some of these one star reviews by some of these people and you can tell they have a few screws loose. Some people just leave one stars to try to get the satisfaction guarantee. Now that's changed, i don't actually see as many 1 star reviews as i did before.
My biggest pet peeve with this is , that an advisor shouldn't be allowed to block you if you've never read with them. I know many of them will search to see your reviews and if you left even one 1 start review, they will block you. That isn't right or fair, and prevents people from leaving honest reviews. I have no issue with honest reviews. but i do with those that are there intentionally to harm someone or because of some personal issues that person is going through.
Its like everything, takes one bad apple to spoil the bunch. There needs to be a middle ground here, the new satisfaction guarantee isn't adequate. They need a better system for trying out a psychic, but with that abuse of the system would quickly ensue.