hi positve,
you said michelle and london were accurate....i only read with michelle once and london a couple of times. last year when i inquired about my sm and his feelings for this other girl he had jumped into a relationship with, london said there was kind of a connection there but she wasnt honest with him...while michelle said "there is absolutely no connection at all there".....
does anyone else think michelle is accurate? london is pretty popular
so i dont know. lucrecia said that on his part it was an "illusion" of being in love with her (which makes the most sense to me considering all the things that happened before and after), and ariel had told me he tried to force himself in love with her.
then i talked to meryl, and she said "he does love you, and he's always loved you, but there is something about her that he LIKES" that also makes sense to me. meryls predictions never happened but i did feel she was an honest empath.
anyhow, im still talking and hanging out with my sm...i think he is uncomfortable labeling us as an official couple for fear that i might push him to commit. after all this time i have finally been able to let go of my attachment to things working out and ending in a certain way (i.e. marrying him). so far, this detachment has been working in my favor. after i started pulling back he has been ALOT different. nonstop texting me and asking me to come over to his house. i was busy this weekend so i said maybe we can next week...but so far out of all the people i have read with on CP, Seha and Eden have been the most accurate. Some specific things that Jean said happened too, but i cannot believe how accurate Seha and Eden have been for me....also, i know some people on here dont really like Kelli, but i have to say she got the "bigger picture" right as well.