She sounds pretty crazy. I would have started running when she saw that an innanimate object had feelings and thought processes. Thats so whacko and mind-blowing..and I would question why people are calling her.
It was the last straw for me and that was one of the last calls I made to her. I knew then I had to stop calling her but it was hard though because I had become dependent on her. Sometimes her readings were amazing, but she had this way of putting doubt in my mind so I would hang up the phone feeling like I couldn't quite trust my own judgment. I've noticed a lot of readers do that, some are much more blatant about it, like if you said "well I think..." then they cut you off very bluntly "No it's..." and assert their version over yours. Judi had a way of doing that too but it was much more subtle and harder for me to catch it when it happened. Even now I still doubt myself at times because I remember things she told me.
In general, I've found empaths the worst psychics to call. Feelings are only one part of the picture..we live with feelings, thoughts and events..and time for these 3 factors to mix around. In addition readers that call themselves empaths could more likely just be guessing their way through a reading. Most people want to know about what will actually happen. You need a psychic has more than just this skill.
I totally agree. An empath can be great to talk to when you just want someone to understand what you're going through. Whether it's a genuinely psychic empathic ability or more of a relational skill, they know how to make people feel better. People will line up for that. And yes people want to know what will actually happen, but it's so much harder to gauge that with an empath because they give a lot of soft information that is subjective, instead of hard data that can be verified.
It can sound like they are right about everything unless/until they give a definite prediction about something you can actually validate. Up until that time they build up a framework of information in your mind that may or may not be right. If you can't verify things for yourself, you can only take their word for it (or not) in blind faith. Of course they tend to say things that the caller really hopes for and wants to believe - and being empathic they know very well what you would most like to hear - which makes it that much harder to choose NOT to take their word for it.
It can become a type of gaslighting, where the caller becomes dependent on the psychic to give them their version of reality. Cold readers do these things too, finding out what the caller wants to hear and giving it to them. I hate to say it but in practice I don't see much different between an empath and a cold reader. I think for that matter the vast majority of psychics use some cold reading techniques, whether they realize it or not, but if they have genuine psychic ability they do much less of it.
I wouldn't say Judi's only talent lies in being an empath, because she was able to see and communicate with my spirit guides. That was not a concrete thing that could be verified, like the fate of my car could be verified, but it was way beyond someone throwing out a lame guess that I might have a dead grandmother. But I don't think she was always accurate in translating what they said to her. There was a point where I knew they wanted me to stop calling her, but it was hard to stop.
Most of the things Judi told me, I wasn't able to verify. To contrast that with another reader, Melody Marie, she is an empath but also a remote viewer, clairvoyant, and clairaudient. I have been able to verify a lot of things she has told me, and she is one of the few who has been able to predict my ex's behavior with any accuracy.
Leave the poor feedback, especially if you know you are not going to call her again. These readers kinda coast on you not calling them out and clients need to consider real reviews. That changing things to fit what you tell them is a red flag..I dont care how good of a reader they are. Its just proof that they will just spout nonsense without thinking.
I agree with this! When I finally left her negative feedback, I was pretty much the only one, and it really stuck out like a sore thumb. I had been watching her feedback for months wondering if I was the only one feeling frustrated. I don't know if I was the only one but if anyone else had spoken up it might have helped me. It made me feel like there had to be something wrong with me, like if she's so great for other people then why do I have a problem? And she could come across as so nice and caring so it just made me feel like a jerk if I questioned her. When I finally left that bad feedback, sure enough other callers wrote their feedback defending her, which just made me feel even worse.
When I see people praising Judi, it reminds me of what I went through and honestly kind of makes me feel sick. But I would not discourage anyone from giving their honest feedback, good or bad. That's what this site is great for and we can go in more detail than Keen allows space for and have more time to think it over too before we write. I have written feedback on Keen that I regretted, usually it was positive feedback that I wrote either because I felt good or because I felt pressured into giving it. Far less often have I regretted leaving a negative and in some cases wish I had done it sooner, if for nothing else just so they would block me from calling again.
