I'd like to punch in on this conversation, because I do, indeed, wish to make a clear distinction between what I consider a psychic with whom I connect and accurate predictions. I had a reading with Jenny in which she mentioned a number of things that I actually know are true. Those items enabled me to confirm that she certainly connected with me, as I mentioned nothing that would lead her to those facts, and they were offered without any prompting on my part.
Now, as I said in my first post in this thread, the predictions offered to me in that reading are plausible. Plausible means that they are worthy of acceptance or could indeed be true, given what I know of the circumstances surrounding my situation. However, that being said, plausible also means that I can't say with any certainty that these predictions are accurate at this point. Furthermore, because we all know that time is fluid, and because Jenny stated right up front with me that she is not good on timing, there's no way to know just how soon I shall be able to confirm whether the predictions offered are accurate either.
My commentary on Jenny's reading was simply to inform others that when getting a reading, what tools do we typically use to ascertain the veracity of the messages we are receiving? Do we feel more connected to a reader when the reader offers us a final outcome that matches what we are seeking? I'd say not. Do we feel more connected to a reader if they describe the individual(s) involved to a "tee"? Perhaps. However, another way we feel we are connected to a reader is when we are offered facts that have either occurred in the past or present that we can validate.
In summary, I believe given the information exchanged in my reading, I connected well with Jenny. Whether that connection will derive the results that she has offered are probable in my situation, however, is yet to be seen.
I'm not assuming this was addressed at my conflicted readings with Jenny, but I did want to clarify about my readings. I do think what smee is suggesting may happen sometimes, but that was definitely not the case with Jenny. The first time I chatted with her, I did so because a forum friend told me she was amazing and asked me to check her out. I asked her about work, since at the time I had zero happening in my life regarding men, and then I asked her a general question about when I would be dating again. This was the phenomenal reading.
I had a lot change in a couple weeks, and suddenly there were two men I wanted to inquire about specifically. Since Jenny was so good, it was a no-brainer, and I chatted with her again. This time, the reading was general and there were no details given to make me think there was any validity to her statements/predictions. Thus far, what she said in that chat has not manifested in any way. In fact, the opposite is true for one of the men I asked about. Based on how things have been going (or not), I don't think things will manifest as she described at all.
I'm not defending any psychic with this comments - it's just an observation of mine. I've found in my own situation that in the past, if nothing had happened between readings, in terms of events or contact, subsequent readings even with some of my preferred readers tend to be less remarkable than earlier ones. I'm not sure if there is a reason for this, or if the reader tries to pull information from their guides to satisfy my queries, when they should simply await a message...but I have noticed this occur.
I agree with this,and i think we should make it a topic in another tread.
