Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com

Inner Angel

<< < (5/6) > >>

SGVues:
I sure will! Thanks so much Tulip. Will pm you the details!

TulipsAndSunflowers:
A little update on this reader. She said I wouldn't be able to do something by end of the year (which was originally the plan) - and that it would be pushed by a month or two, but it will work out - this is correct! It now looks like end of January is more likely, even tho I was hoping she'd be wrong...
She also said my main POI is still interested in me and has feelings for me, but we will not end up together long term - but I will have a choice to be with him romantically again if I choose to do so. Me and him have been in constant contact since his ghosting me earlier in the year. He even started going to therapy. Inner Angel said that he'd want to restart our romance and talk about his feelings and regrets - true!
I have a few more predictions pending. Will call her again at some point, she was nice and very realistic.
Anyone else has any updates on her?

Mina:
I would agree she too has been accurate but has been general about it… however with my last reading she said something I assumed she knew and instead she asked a question and it made me made me doubt she was even connected to my situation. And with her I’ve been giving 1-2 month leniency time frames too, I am leaning in not contacting her again- it seems too general for me.
But she is lovely, she is nice, I do think some of the criticism she received awhile back was uncalled for- ugh though I see I’m kinda doing that.

Edit:
Yeah re-reading my last readings for her price range if $5 seems reasonable but I would like her to be more specific if her price range goes up (but I bet that makes me sound egotistical greedy, is spoiled spiritual brat). I also don’t ask about work matters only love. And believe I would like to ask about family and work- but when I do it just makes me paranoid, and I wonder if that also leaks to love my life

1234:
Does she tend to be a fairytale reader? Or has she predicted a negative outcome that turned out to be true?

ANF353:
I’ve read with her twice. The first time she was technically correct on outcome but the reading was so vague I really just think it was because she had a 50/50 shot. The timeframe has passed by a few days for the outcome on the second reading by a few days. The readings were more than a year apart and when I looked back at the first transcript, she used the same lines. A lot has changed in that year so it made me believe she wasn’t connected at all. Very nice, but I wouldn’t go back.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page