Author Topic: CONSTANCE.  (Read 5344 times)

Offline xXNikkiXx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
CONSTANCE.
« on: November 29, 2023, 03:45:13 AM »
If you haven’t read with Constance, you should. She is one of the most authentic psychics I have ever seen. She’s not only one of the best on the site if not the best but almost every single one of her predictions have happened! She doesn’t sugarcoat and tells the truth good or bad but she is almost ALWAYS right. Give her a try if you haven’t already and if you have I would love to hear your experiences with this amazing woman!

Offline flora0250

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
Re: CONSTANCE.
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2024, 05:42:47 AM »
I found her to be very general and asking leading questions unfortunately.I tried to hang in there but the call was just immediately not good. I asked if I would reconnect with my POI and she said she didn’t know what I meant because he seemed to be st a distance. Um, right, we haven’t been in touch and that’s why I’m asking if we’ll reconnect. 🙄 So that wasted about a minute. Then she said she saw him turning back and looking back and asked me how long I had known him. Do I had to give her more info. She ended up telling me I wouldn’t hear from him and that it was a shame because he didn’t give me “closure.” But he didn’t ghost me or anything and was clear in his communication with me. Maybe her outcome will be right but I can’t credit it to any psychic ability. She didn’t give me anything to validate anything and it was very general comments anyone could guess at.

Offline Katierlou

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: CONSTANCE.
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2024, 07:06:35 AM »
I'm not psychic lol but the OP maybe is the reader she's commenting on lol

Offline xXNikkiXx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: CONSTANCE.
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2024, 06:26:39 AM »
I'm not psychic lol but the OP maybe is the reader she's commenting on lol

You're definitely not psychic cause you're wrong. She is not the only reader I've made posts about. I have lots of different ones if you take the time to go and read instead of making idiotic assumptions. There are at least or 15 different posts from me on here reviewing different advisors, cause you know, that's the point of the site. LMAO. She has just always been accurate for me and that's my honest opinion... She is one of my top advisors. She DOES ask questions but she has been accurate 90% of the time for me. She repeated back to me what someone has said to me before word by word so I know for a fact she's authentic.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2024, 06:34:33 AM by xXNikkiXx »

Offline flora0250

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
Re: CONSTANCE.
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2024, 10:50:58 AM »
For me, I’m ok with giving a birthday or even date of last contact and very neutral info like that. But when an advisor asks me “what do you mean by will you reconnect” and “how long have you known him” -(and without providing any validating info at all)  those are different kinds of questions that impact the integrity of the reading in my opinion.

Offline serenejoy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
  • walk by faith, not by sight
Re: CONSTANCE.
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2024, 01:49:24 PM »
For me, I’m ok with giving a birthday or even date of last contact and very neutral info like that. But when an advisor asks me “what do you mean by will you reconnect” and “how long have you known him” -(and without providing any validating info at all)  those are different kinds of questions that impact the integrity of the reading in my opinion.

I think the question of "when did you last speak?" or any type of last contact question can 100% impact the course of the reading. There is USUALLY a big difference when someone hasn't heard or spoken to someone in 5-7 months vs 2 days. That's just my opinion. I've never read with Constance but I've had readers who I consider good who have asked me that question too.

Offline flora0250

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
Re: CONSTANCE.
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2024, 01:56:42 PM »
For me, I’m ok with giving a birthday or even date of last contact and very neutral info like that. But when an advisor asks me “what do you mean by will you reconnect” and “how long have you known him” -(and without providing any validating info at all)  those are different kinds of questions that impact the integrity of the reading in my opinion.

I think the question of "when did you last speak?" or any type of last contact question can 100% impact the course of the reading. There is USUALLY a big difference when someone hasn't heard or spoken to someone in 5-7 months vs 2 days. That's just my opinion. I've never read with Constance but I've had readers who I consider good who have asked me that question too.

I agree - definitely the amount of time since last contact can impact a reading - but with readers that either I trust from other readings or that have given me something that validates they are picking up on specifics about me or my POI - I don’t mind giving that date of last contact. Because honestly last contact could have been a horrible fight or completely the opposite. Just date of last contact in some situations I’m good with.

But “how long have you known” the person - well that’s a different kettle of fish all together! Idk just my opinion.