Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > CaliforniaPsychics.com
CLEO
SarahM:
I just hate her reading style. Like others have mentioned on here she’s just so monotone and dry and too all over the place! Also tends to lean negative
queenofwands:
--- Quote from: SarahM on August 06, 2021, 03:04:47 PM ---I just hate her reading style. Like others have mentioned on here she’s just so monotone and dry and too all over the place! Also tends to lean negative
--- End quote ---
She's not negative she's just wrong, lol. She's been positive about 2 guys I've called about last year (I honestly didn't even care if anything happened with them, just called for fun and curious) and she gave me fairy tales that didn't happen. Then negative about this current POI that wants to marry me. ;D
SarahM:
Anyone else? So sad I used to connect with this reader so well and now she can’t even get one thing right anymore
AnxiouslyWaiting2012:
I have a hit for Cleo. I call Cleo every now and then and this is the 2nd time she’s been accurate for me. I called to see what is coming up for my boyfriend and myself. Cleo started by saying I see you guys taking a trip coming up. Somewhere tropical. She then said I get the marriage card. Previously when I’ve read with Cleo she would say I don’t see a ring or marriage so it’s not coming up yet.
Well, Cleo was correct. My boyfriend just surprised me with a trip to Maui as my birthday gift. Due to the exotic nature of the trip, I am hoping he will propose while we are there. I can’t think of a better setting.
I will say that Cleo is correct if you do not call her all the time. I call her sparingly and the last 2 times I have, she’s been accurate.
dascallie:
Cleo has one of the very best track records anywhere in my experience.
I've read with many psychics over many years. That gives me a very large body of evidence as to who is honestly gifted and who is not.
Cleo has off days, as all do--(There is NO 100% all the time psychic athlete!) but all things factored in, she is a consistent standout in my experience. Far more than someone like "Yona" ( completely entangled gobbledy-gook ramble subject to anyone's abstract interpretation in my experience) Apologies to Yona fans.
For those here demanding 90-100% accuracy --or Cleo is a "waste of money" a "loser"-- stop and think about what you are saying.
Cleo is operating and extracting specific information from an ephemeral, anomalous source.... NOBODY--including scientists, (that admit psychics like Cleo really do somehow access information from beyond their 5 senses) cannot honestly define what or how this works.
Time is a RIVER with billions of intersecting events, people, emotions, happenings, parallel dimensions. Cleo's
accuracy record and just her ability to pull a stream of correct info should wow you and knock your socks off.
Once in a blue moon, something may be intensely imprinted to happen at a certain time date ( "all the stars align")and very occasionally it can be predicted. But it seems at least 80% of the time 'events are subject to the whims and ways of our energetic reality. You know why?
Because "Creation" is not held hostage to ANYBODY and their ego 'wants' in this realm. It is an always moving, churning, changing field because is it always CREATING--they don't call God the "Creator" for nothing.
Were creation to stop churning and serve the selfish wants of individuals ( hmm is the the protocol of dark sided 'black magic' ? No thank you.
If you could enslave our multidimentional reality to unilaterally serve YOUR desires, it would fall backward and decay. Stasis is not allowed in God's Kingdom.
Energy grinds forward--with you, or without you--sometime in your favor, sometimes not.
Retrieving 'psychic' information at rates of anything over 70% is nothing short of spectacular.
I suggest a little less self-centered "foot stamping" when you dont get the reading you want-- and more awe for those talented psychics that deliver far more often than not. Cleo is given the gift of "God wink's" and a glimpse into the larger majesty.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version