I try to give fair and balanced reporting whether they're heavy hitters or not. There have been a few heavy hitters that don't work for me at all (Cookie, QoCs, Mattie come to mind). Sometimes they get random stuff, but it's usually general, insignificant, or just not useful things. I've gotten to a point that I prefer general readings and predictions without timelines. I also prefer when a reader openly admits they can't connect with you or can't get anything on a particular situation. My experience is that this is most common with the heavy hitters because they usually have their own site where you schedule a reading for a set amount of time and not per minute. When they're wrong, they're wrong though. After years of readings, I've learned their strengths and weaknesses.