Apologies in advance, no offense intended but--I do not get why so many believe in tarot as some magical divination tool. It's just a set of illustrations printed on card stock.
I just don't buy there is some invisible force that is intentionally, magically PHYSICALLY manipulating (selecting) very specific cards just for us, at any moment in time.
Readers say the pics help them decode their spontaneous clair data...ok, maybe that could be I suppose.
But I wonder if that's more an act of 'retrofitting' the card to their more pure clairvoyant *knowing*. In which case, it seems they could ramble off on tales and mislead all over the place. Which is why I look hard for no tools readers, even as scattered as they can come across at times---but that very aspect is more representative of how true psychic ability manifests in my experience.
The super defined, detailed storyline is suspect to me---and probably heavily influenced by the tarot pictures...I mean in days of yore, any working fortune teller would need a 'talk track' to keep the convo flowing to earn their fee, right?
Tarot is the talk track prompter maybe.
I much prefer no tools readers--I'm positive they have psychic abilities, remote viewing etc--but also receive a boatload of seemingly meaningless 'context' information while missing the elephant in the middle of the room.
Kate Marquez is someone folks might want to try. Pretty darn spectacular psychic aptitude.