So here’s my thought. Sounds maybe simple but just wanted to kind of try to define it and get others thoughts.
I’ve been looking st this board and reviews and reviews on sites and asking people who has worked for them etc. and I think you can really only say so much.
First of all we all know there are SO many fakes. So, so, so many.
But I think also there have been enough people that have had experiences that cannot be chalked up to cold read techniques or lucky guesses. I have not had many but now I really am able to go back and know where I was given specific info I could validate vs possible cold read techniques. And boy those cold read techniques are tricky! People can be so good at messing with your head especially if you’re vulnerable already! Experienced cold readers can be very very good at making something general *sound* specific to you.
This is very different than when you connect with an advisor who just automatically gives you some specific where you know for a fact there is no way someone could know something *that* specific. Problem is it’s a bit of a moving target. Something you thought was specific you can go back and revisit and realize oh wait no it wasn’t. But others you can’t deny and stand the test of revisiting the reading and still hold true.
What I really want to say is once a person gets through all that, which takes a ridiculous amount of money, time, and effort, (how much is it even worth it in the end anyway though given how predictions are usually so unlikely to come about) - once a person is able to finally weed through that then you have the process of trying to determine if the predictions (again specific not general enough to apply to anyone) actually happen or not. Which if the prediction is far away, takes even more time.
But finally, finally if you get through all of that and end up with 1 - 3 advisors who meet both criteria- then you have your *personal* 1 - 3 that work for you personally.
So all these reviews - really when it comes down to it - I think that personal 1 - 3 readers is diffeeent for everyone. I mean could be vastly different. So all these reviews are almost not of much value! Because I really do think it’s a personal connection between you and the reader and that determination of whether or not they will work for you is so individual, I’m not sure how much real value the reviews provide other than to really call out and weed out those that are truly fake and predatory. Which I believe are a lot.
Anyway sorry to ramble. But it really is an individual thing and generalizations on whether or not a reader is good or accurate for one person doesn’t mean they will be the same for another, other than those that are repeatedly wrong for many and we can weed out as fraudulent.