I like that with chat, it saves all the previous conversations in one long feed so I can look back at it during the reading. It also saves it in the transactions so I can look back at it whenever I want just to see if things panned out or not. With phone conversations, I find that my emotions after the call cause me to feel like the reader was more accurate than they probably were. With chat, I can look back later and see if maybe some things were just good guesses that bamboozled me at the time lol. I'm also a really fast typist though. I could see how being a slow typist would mess with things.
I've also noticed that some of the readers are at their best during chat as opposed to phone. And the reading is more dense with predictions instead of chit chat. One reader told me once when I asked why she only does chat that she wants her 5 senses to be as turned down as possible so she knows what she's getting is from intuition and not assumption and she can meditate better without being distracted by someone's voice. I'm not sure if that's true of other readers but it made sense to me.
I have also chatted with some ssslllloooowwww typists and it made me wonder what made them think it was a good idea to offer chat. And Keen doesn't have a waiting in line system for chat like they do for phone so you have to wait around for your favorite psychic to be free and hope you catch them right away. So I think chat IS as accurate, if not more so but there are pros and cons to each. Just my two cents!
Oh, also, the reader who only does chat recently emailed her clients and said Keen is working on rolling out an "arrange a chat" feature soon. So that's good at least. Let's hope it's not glitchy..
ssslllloooowwww typistsI was totally laughing at this because I average about 80 words per minute and even faster on great days, but specifically with Bitwine, those effing readers know they can't type and shouldn't even be there. JHC they frustrate me to no end. Typing is not a requirement for the readers. Which means the clients suffer through the wait of the reader finding the appropriate keystroke. Really??
I liked chat when it first came around because it was fun and much more private than a phone reading imo. The biggest drawback is allowing the reader to see what they talked about with us previously. Many will review those transcripts and talk through the current call based on what they said the last time. DZigns has done this to me. She even typed to me, let's see what we discussed before then brought up a job she previously predicted I would have, which I didn't. She even said, how's the new job. Ughhh. Many things in her reading resonated with current events, but anything past that was a zilch. I've read with her at least two times and I'm just about over it. I should call her on her own site and ask her about crap not happening and see what she says.
Because I am an efficient person and want to get the most bang for my buck, I oftentimes have the question already typed out so I can copy/paste it to the platform to get the ball rolling. As fast as I am, it still doesn't make the reader go any faster in their delivery. I can actually hear my heartbeat while waiting for the reader to give their response.
I have to give it to Calazar Coach or whatever her name is. She has pegged a lot of stuff for the short time we've read via chat and she sends minutes often. Has anyone ever gotten any minutes from DZigns??
Of course the new system is going to be glitchy. Glitches have to happen in order to make it less glitchy. Callers or chatters rather will be the test subjects.
