I used to go to 3 readers that I trusted for the most part. All 3 used guides for their information and all 3 gave me different predictions/guidance concerning one matter I was calling about. This alerted me to the fact that these "guides" have their own opinions and may possibly not be able to know the total truth or offer accurate predictions.
Definitely. I have experienced this with my own guides, they definitely have their own views and opinions about things and not all of them agree with each other. One of my guides is a bit of a renegade actually and tends to go against the others. Certainly none of them have the "total truth," far from it.
Most of their predictions have been accurate for me - except regarding a couple of situations, they would turn out to be right up to a certain point, but when things reach that critical turning point, it would go another way or more delays set in. It has been very frustrating and disappointing, and I've questioned why they would even tell me these things to begin with, if they couldn't be sure of what would happen and/or get the message across to me accurately.
This is my most burning question now - not so much WHAT will happen or WHAT the message is, but WHY have I been told these things. WHY would my guides deliberately interfere with my path in life.
I've had a few readers insist to me that I must not be getting the messages correctly - because THEIR guides would be telling them something different - but like you said, the guides do not all agree on things - and some of these same readers would end up being wrong too, about the things their guides allegedly said to them.
Other readers have totally corroborated the things my guides have said, in the most uncanny ways, down to using the exact same phrasing or images or concepts they have used to communicate with me...and I considered whether they could simply be reading my mind and pulling out those words and images, but they got much more information beyond that. I think those readers truly connected with my guides. Yet, their predictions, if they made any, would still be wrong.
This is where it would get tricky, because my guides did not convey those predictions to me directly. Those predictions only came to me from or through the reader. But the precedent of having the reader speak for my guides would make it feel as if the prediction was coming from my guides. Even if I felt strongly that the prediction was going to be wrong, I would feel like I had to listen to the reader since they had been speaking for my guides and had been accurate about so many things.
I do believe sometimes this happens because the reader's ego sometimes gets in the way...they feel like they have to prove themselves, or compete with other readers who offer predictions, they feel the caller expects a prediction, whatever.
However, I wonder sometimes if other entities hijack the connection and push the reader to say things that are misleading or untrue, or bizarre, or downright incoherent. But here's what has been the most disturbing to me...a psychic would keep saying over and over: my guides are saying XYZ will happen...only to be proven wrong when the opposite happens, or the prediction simply does not come through. And when it does not happen like they said, they respond with what sounds like sincere confusion - not backtracking or talking their way out of it like a typical cold reader - instead they sound like they really, sincerely believed it would happen and don't understand why it didn't.
So they check in for more information, and tell me that the guides continue to say XYZ. Well what's strange about it to me, is when they check in with their guides they become very passive...where there for a second they might have expressed a bit of skepticism or rationality, suddenly it sounds like they are under a spell again, and the messages they convey are not logical at all, and even fly in the face of whatever just happened.
What gets me is that this can go on - and I hate to admit how long I've stuck with any reader who was so consistently wrong, but it would go on for months - and the readers would know that their predictions weren't panning out and that their "guides" had been wrong - yet they never developed any real skepticism about what their guides were saying.