Scott Angel told me pretty much the opposite of Melody Marie too, at least in terms of ultimate outcome. Basically his outlook was negative and hers is more positive...NOT fairytale positive but realistically positive. Most of the readers I've spoken to have been pretty much split down the middle on this one situation.
Scott Angel didn't tell me anything really specific to my situation. I regret calling him, when I called I was already in a very negative state of mind and everything he said just confirmed my worst suspicions and fears. But when I looked back at my notes later, everything he said was pretty generic and could apply to almost anyone in my situation. Melody has been far from generic and has given me specific details that I could verify. Her accuracy for me has improved over time.
Melody reads people with a lot of compassion. Scott Angel's outlook was cynical to the opposite extreme of Melody. I wouldn't say they were contradictory, it was a difference between seeing the potential for things to change for the better vs. saying no it never will. What if it's not set in stone, instead you influence the outcome based on which outlook you take? I would rather go with someone who is positive. I am done with cynical readers.
