Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Psychic Readings That Came True

Realism - too much to expect?

<< < (2/3) > >>

skyline:

--- Quote ---My feeling on this has always been that, if spirit guides and psychic powers are real, they'll communicate as best they can...however, if all they can do is snapshots and auditory snippets, it's hard to get a clear picture from that and the psychic will fill in the blanks on their own.
--- End quote ---

Yes, it's snapshots. And the more readings I get, the more I realize that we're not meant to know everything.

I had something happen recently that none of the gifted readers picked up. In fact, they told me the opposite. It tells me that I just wasn't supposed to know about it beforehand.

I did intuitively pick up on it a day before it happened.

Zee:
No one expects to know everything. This isn't even a rational probability.  Do you mean that we aren't suppose to know (at times) the answer to some of our questions?  That makes more sense to me.  Besides, no one calls about everything, just some of their challenges.

If the reader told you the exact opposite, they were just wrong.  They misinterpreted the signs or what their guides told them. If the reader says they can't see the answer or aren't getting anything, then I take that as an answer of wait and see. 

Readers know their strengths and weaknesses (at least they should) and should be forthcoming in their responses when they don't know, instead of making crap up.

Bark angel:
I guess my posts weren't too clear so let me explain.  My initial question was meant to ask "how much realism is required in a reading in order for us to consider the reader to be accurate?".  Let me say that I have had readings where psychics will say you will get contact, but it is a text or an email, because it is not a phone call and it is not face-to-face, and it will come in on a Monday - I am thinking in 3 weeks".

OK, now is it possible that this reader's guides told him/her this exact information - I mean so far as to explain how the contact will come in the form of a text or an email?  Or is this the reader filling in the blanks?

Zee:
It almost sounds like, that with the advancement of technology, you aren't sure that guides would be able to know what a text, email or SMS is.  Does this matter?  Guides in some respect are tools, aren't they?  Readers may see in their visions that contact will happen by text, after their guides mention that contact will happen.

Aren't they using their tools (guides) to answer your question and to marry everything else together cohesively, in terminology we would understand in today's terms?

Accuracy for me is if the reader is specific about my circumstances and if I asked about contact and they said via phone; then if/when it happens by phone, then I consider them accurate. They get more points if predictions happen as they see them as well. I don't need general daily information (insignificant stuff). I prefer the bigger picture items...things that matter.

skyline:

--- Quote from: Zee on January 27, 2014, 08:45:50 PM ---No one expects to know everything. This isn't even a rational probability.  Do you mean that we aren't suppose to know (at times) the answer to some of our questions?  That makes more sense to me.  Besides, no one calls about everything, just some of their challenges.
--- End quote ---

Yes, that's what I meant. I'm pretty convinced that we're not supposed to know the answer to some of our questions.

In my case, with the opposite happening, maybe it's just a case of psychics never telling you anything bad, because nobody picked it up.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page