I have read with more people in the last year or so than I would like to admit. I read with fewer now than I once did as I have weeded them down to a handful that I go back to.
In order for me to go back to a reader it must fit into at least one of the following categories:
Category 1. It offered data, specific information, that I can validate that is unique to me and my situation. These facts have to be specific to me and my life and not general.
Category 2. There was an absence of generic, universal comments that could apply to anyone and to make sure of this if a reader has multiple listings, and since I am calling about a love interest I choose the listing that is not entitled "love relationships" because that tips off the reader right away.
Category 3. The situation, causes, outcome and supplemental information resonates with me as plausible when compared to the facts that I already have at hand in reality (things I know already of which I have tangible evidence).
If a reader hits on any of the above I will read with them again, but the vast majority of the readers that I have consulted with don't. And even if their reading follows the lines that I'd like in terms of a prediction, if one of the above does not apply, I do not read with them again.
This is NOT the best reading to date but it is one of those that I consider remarkable. I get readings that simply shower me with facts in category 1 - some of which I can validate, others that I can't. This reading did not shower me with facts, but it did hit on a couple in category 1, it also met category 3 as well.
My all-time best reading to date has met all three categories.