Cocoapple -
Some of what you write here about my intentions is correct. I have no BAD intentions at all. I am not confrontational at ALL. Not ONE! I am not supporting ANY psychic. Not ONE! I am not trying to change anyone's opinion of psychics BUT I am intent on making sure that the reviews of particular psychics are presented as just that - one person's opinion and review of their experience, and their experience ONLY and that is quite distinct from FACT.
Why? Because I have watched what happens here, time and time again - there is a "Psychic Reviews Domino Effect" and that quite honestly instills fear-mongering in all the members and it has the potential to have a negative impact not only on members that have had a different experience with a particular psychic - but worse yet, it has the potential to impact a person's professional career. I wouldn't want to have my career impacted by supposition - especially when I cannot and am not given a chance to rebut those claims.
And before any of the naysayers jump onboard this slaughter bandwagon again, let me be clear. I am not an advocate for ANY psychic. I am an advocate for fairness, equality and honesty. ONLY!
Rarely, do I come out swinging! But that is what I encounter from a band of rogues here that think they can do anything without cause, complaint or reaction from me. It's just plain UNFAIR.
Take a look at this thread. In my initial comment, I simply reported what is written by the psychic in question. She explains that it is common for her to not take a call. I shared that information, offering it as perhaps an explanation why Deciball.diva had the experience she did. I made certain that I used the words "in my opinion" when it comes to what I deduced from that fact. I was TAKEN TO TASK. Why? I am clear in distinguishing what is my opinion and what I wish to be considered as FACT.
As for Somnus - well, let's leave it as this: Some people cannot wait to jump in and START mud-slinging. I can say this, I rarely, if ever, cast the first stone. I wish I could say that for others.
You are right, I do try to stay NEUTRAL. It's not a crime to ask questions. Not where I live anyway. I do not try to give psychics the benefit of the doubt, either. When I was reading with psychics I encountered many that I would never call again, if I had the need to and, IN MY OPINION, did not convince me of their talents. I never read with Diosa, so I cannot comment on any personal experience with her that I had. But nothing that I shared in my first post here should have rubbed anyone the wrong way - be they emotional or not. I simply offered a fact that is posted in Diosa's own psychic profile, and my opinion that this could explain the situation that Deciball.diva had.
I didn't take exception to Deciball. diva saying my opinion carries no more weight than hers because that is correct. It doesn't. But what I was attempting to point out is that part of what I posted was not an opinion at all - and that was the part that mattered. I shared what the reader had stated herself. That's not an opinion - that is a fact.
However, there are as I said a small group of people that simply delight in fanning anything into a full-blown conflagration. I could list their names here (5 of the offenders come to mind, immediately) but I won't because they know (and most people who read here frequently) already who they are.
You may not like my delivery, or what I wrote - but please don't categorize it as insulting, offensive, argumentative, angry, or anything like that, because it wasn't. There was no anger - no attack, no insults and - you'll see that I said nothing that could rub anyone the wrong way. And I think what really accelerates what WAS ALWAYS INTENDED TO BE A SIMPLE DISCUSSION (which should be allowed because, after all, this is a blooming discussion board) into something else is jumping into "attack" mode. That is what I object to. Some of you can use whatever excuses you wish to explain why you have to constantly be on attack, but please don't point the finger at me.
Ok, thanks a lot.
Eeer.... how does this get ugly again!!!??? I'm going to TRY to understand all sides here. I think @bark angel tries to stay neutral and give psychics benefit of the doubt OR tries to understand and ask questions and comes off in a certain way that rubs a lot of people the wrong way. A lot of us here on the board are in various emotional states and some days we can tolerate more than other days..... i know myself is the same way so our fire are easily lite. I think by now, we all know how bark angel operates and the way she delivers herself so i don't think we should jump right into defensive mode so quickly. It's like this friend in your circle who always says the wrong things at the wrong time and can't be changed cuz that's just the way they operate so you learn and adapt to it and stop taking it too personally. I know i have a friend in my circle like that and at first it was soooo annoying and i get so short tempered but i learn that this is how she is and her intentions aren't bad... just the way she delivers herself takes time getting used to and it's not personal. I think of @bark angel like that. This is just my opinion.
Now let's all focus on those kittens... cuz they are soft and cute. I have subscribed to catsofinstagram....it brightens up my day
Now back to Diosa~ i read with her under Chrys' recommendation as well. She's like LadyP IMO, great with current and past....no doubt she has a gift of some sort and only time will tell if things will happen as she described it. @bark angel, have you read with Diosa? What's your take on this reader?